Hire Software Engineer
7+ Years | Software Engineering, Architecture & Full Stack
I bring software engineering discipline to every project — proper system design, test-driven development, clean architecture, and production-ready code. Whether it's a greenfield build, a legacy modernization, or scaling an existing product, I focus on building software that lasts and teams can maintain.
Software engineer hiring — as opposed to developer hiring — makes sense when the problem is architectural, not just functional. You need someone who will push back on a feature request that creates technical debt, write an ADR before starting a system design, and deliver code with enough test coverage that the next person can refactor safely. Work I do at this level: designing multi-service systems with clear API contracts, leading refactoring efforts on codebases where adding features has become dangerous, establishing code review standards for growing engineering teams, and making the build-vs-buy calls that determine whether a product is maintainable two years from now.
Let's Build Together
Quick Response | Full Transparency & NDA Protection
Companies I've Worked With
Trusted by innovative teams and forward-thinking organizations
Start a Conversation
Let's Talk About Your ProjectTechnical Expertise
7+ years of hands-on experience across the full development stack
Senior Engineering Judgment — What It's Actually Worth
The difference between a developer and an engineer is what they refuse to build.
System design emerges from the first few PRs. Nobody drew the boxes before coding started. Now the system is hard to reason about and impossible to scale cleanly.
Architecture Decision Records written for every significant technical choice. System diagram agreed with stakeholders before implementation starts. Design is reversible at the diagram stage — not at the refactoring stage.
New features take 3× longer than they should because the existing code is fragile. Every change requires understanding the entire system. Good engineers leave.
Tests written for the behavior before refactoring the implementation. Boy Scout Rule applied: leave each file slightly cleaner than you found it. Debt paid down continuously, not in a catastrophic rewrite.
Pull requests approved in 30 seconds. No design feedback, no security review, no test coverage check. PRs become a bureaucratic box to tick.
Reviews check architecture fit, test coverage, security implications (IDOR, injection, auth), and whether the abstraction is right — not just whether the code compiles. Review comments are educational, not just blocking.
No test suite means every deployment is a manual QA session. Confidence is low. Deploys happen at low-traffic times. The team is afraid of the codebase.
Tests written before implementation. Red-green-refactor cycle enforced in PRs. Test coverage measured in CI and reported on each PR. Deploying becomes boring — which is exactly the goal.
Full-time hiring takes 2–3 months of recruiting, interviews, and notice periods. Your roadmap sits idle.
No recruiting pipeline, no notice period. Reach out today and we can be writing code by end of week.
Account managers relay messages to developers you've never spoken to. Feedback takes days to reach the person building.
You talk directly to me — the person writing every line. Slack, email, or video. No middlemen, no message relay.
Ready to work with a senior engineer?
Let's Talk About Your ProjectHow It Works
A straightforward process built for fast starts and transparent delivery.
Tell Me About Your Project
Send the project form with your requirements, timeline, and what success looks like. I respond within 24 hours with questions and a scoping proposal.
Agree on Scope & Rate
We align on deliverables, timeline, and engagement model — hourly, fixed-price, or retainer. A signed agreement before any code is written.
Codebase Audit + Architecture Review
Full codebase read: architecture, test coverage, dependency audit, security scan, and performance baseline. ADR written for agreed architectural changes before any code is modified.
TDD, Feature Branches, Reviewed PRs
Every feature developed test-first. PRs include tests, migration plans for breaking changes, and a clear description of the architectural trade-off made. Review sessions held for significant design decisions.
Delivery: Documented Architecture + Healthy Codebase
System design documented with component diagram. Test coverage at or above the agreed threshold. Security review completed. Runbook updated. Handoff session with your engineering team.
Transparent process, no surprises, no scope creep without discussion.
Code, IP, repository, deployment credentials — all yours from day one.
Daily or weekly async updates. You always know what's built, what's next, what's blocked.
Common Questions
How quickly can I start?
Within 24–48 hours after scope is agreed.
How do we communicate?
Directly — Slack, email, or video. No account managers or relay chains.
What if requirements change?
Changes discussed openly — scope and timeline impact agreed before proceeding.
Who owns the code?
You do. Full IP ownership transferred on delivery. No strings attached.
Ready to move past the hiring bottleneck?
Let's Talk About Your ProjectRecommendations
I start every project with a quick discovery call to understand your goals and recommend the best tech solution. Here’s what clients and coworkers say about working with me as a Python Django developer.
Dhruval Patel
Data Engineer | Software Engineer | Python | SQL | ML | Backend
Kamlesh Kasambe
Full Stack Developer
Pricing & Rates
Transparent, flexible pricing that scales with your project complexity and needs
What Affects Service Rate
Project Complexity
Simple CRUD apps differ from microservices architecture or real-time systems.
Technical Responsibility
Architecting systems costs more than executing well-defined tasks.
Time Commitment
Long-term engagements (retainers) may have different rates than hourly work.
Team Scaling
Managing additional developers or handling team coordination increases cost.
Ongoing Support
Maintenance, monitoring, and continuous improvements have different pricing models.
Engagement Models
Perfect for smaller projects, quick fixes, or when scope isn't fully defined. You pay only for time spent.
Clear scope, defined deliverables, and fixed price. Great when you know exactly what you need.
Ongoing monthly commitment for continuous work, maintenance, or on-call support. Lower rates for predictable work.
Pricing is always discussed upfront and aligned with scope. You'll know exactly what you're paying for and why. No unexpected bills, no vague fees.
Pricing Questions
Can I get a discount for longer engagements?
Yes. Retainer arrangements and long-term commitments typically have lower rates than hourly work.
Do you offer fixed-price projects?
Absolutely. If your project scope is clear and defined, I can agree on a fixed price upfront with specific deliverables and timeline.
What if scope changes mid-project?
We discuss and adjust transparently. Changes are tracked, impact is calculated, and we align on new pricing before proceeding.
Do rates go up for more complex work?
Yes. Complex architecture, real-time systems, or leadership responsibilities command higher rates.
Do you offer payment plans or installments?
We can discuss flexible payment schedules for larger projects. Typically, installments align with project milestones.
How do you determine the final rate?
During our initial conversation, I'll understand your project scope, complexity, and needs. Then we'll discuss what makes sense and agree on pricing.